001068 RE 132. The Court recalls its previous decisions wherein it held that “when the Court finds any of the rights, duties and freedoms set out in the Charter is curtailed, violated or not being achieved, this necessarily means that the obligation set out under Article 1 of the Charter has not been complied with and has been violated.”3" 133. In the instant case, having found that the Applicant’s right to liberty, nationality, to security of his person and the right not to be unlawfully detained have been violated, the Court holds that the Respondent State has violated its obligations under Article 1 of the Charter. Vill. REPARATIONS 134. The Court notes that Article 27(1) of the Protocol provides that: "If the Court finds that there has been a violation of a human and peoples’ rights, it shall make appropriate orders to remedy the violation, including the payment of fair compensation or reparation". 135. In this respect, Rule 63 of the Rules of Court provides that: "The Court shall rule on the request for reparation ... by the same decision establishing a human or peoples’ right or, if the circumstances so require, by a separate decision.” 136. In the instant case, the Court has already found that the Applicant's rights under Articles 1, 5, 6, and 12 of the Charter and Article 15 of the Universal Declaration of Human A. Rights, have been violated. Pecuniary reparations 31 Alex Thomas v. Tanzania (Merits), § 135; Norbert Zongo and Others v. Burkina Faso (Merits) (2014) 1 AfCLR 219, page 54, § 199. a WZ Hf ef hf J yi fo ZF 34 A N\ 7 { \———. iY oe pala C , eowwp Dy “ “ae > " ] _ “L { ee