argument orI conclusion. We.,..,are not .in doubt that the said paragraphs .... are prayer or legal argument and or conclusion, therefore the objection by the 1st defendant is sustained. The next question is, even if the said paragraphs are discountenanced would the remaining paragraph sustain the application for interim injunction? ANALYSIS ON THE APPLICATION FOR INTERIM INJUNCTION 39. Article 20 (21) of Protocol (A/P1/ 7 /91) on the Community Court of Justice states that the Court, each time a case is brought before it, may order any provisional measure or issue any provisional measure or issue any provisional instructions which it may consider necessary or . . desirable. Also Article 79 of the Rules of this Court provides that an application under Article 20 of the Protocol shall state the subjectmatter of the proceedings, the circumstances giving rise to urgency and ·· --···-··-, ="·· -"'"---------·-: : ,.;. the pleas of facts and law abolishing a prima facie case for the interim measures applied for. 40. It follows that even though the said provision of the Protocol and the Rules of the Court mentioned interim measures, the effect of the relief sought in the motion / application of the the same thing. - 2nd plaintiff would mean Whether the application used the words, interim injunction, interim measures or provisional measures, the relief is the same. and within the purview of Article 20 of the said Protocol and Article 79 of the Rules of this Court. 15

Select target paragraph3