Christopher R. Mtikila v United Republic of Tanzania (reparations)(2014) 1 AfCLR 72, para 29. The Court in the course of its analysis above, has come to the conclusion that the following rights has been violated for which appropriate remedy are ordered: The right to liberty (Article 7) of the Charter), to have his cause heard (Article 7 of the Charter); right to work (Article 15 of the Charter) and Article 1of the Charter. 68. Having found that the Respondent State has violated several rights of the Applicant contrary to the provisions of the Charter and other international human rights instruments ratified by the Respondent State, the Court finds that the Respondent State is liable and responsible under international law for remedying the violations against the Applicant. 69.The court however notes that with regards to the applicant’s application for an order for payment of his monthly salary in the sum of 50,000 naira from March 2015 to date of judgment and also the sum of 45,000 naira as operation allowance from March 2015 to date of judgment, no documentary evidence was provided to support these amounts. In that wise the Court is unable to award the claimed sum. However, since the applicant would have been entitled to salary and the operation allowance within these periods, the court directs the Respondent who is the natural custodian of these information to calculate and pay the Applicant the applicable amount up to the time of release from detention. COSTS 70.Article 66 (11) of the Rules provides, “If costs are not claimed, the parties shall bear their own costs.” The Court notes that the Applicant did not make any claim as to costs; the Court therefore decides that he shall bear his own costs. 31