vii. Holds that the Respondent State has not violated the Applicant's right to a fair trial under Article 7(1) of the Charter in terms of the alleged irregularities in the visual identification, and the denial of the opportunity to challenge je the prosecution's evidence and the alibi defence; iis vill. Holds that the Respondent State has violated the Applicant's right to afair trial, provided under Article 7(1)(c) of the Charter, as read together with Article he 14(3)(d) of the ICCPR by failing to provide him with free legal assistance; ar Holds that the Respondent State has violated the Applicant's right to be tried within a reasonable time as regards Criminal Appeal No 58/2006 examined by the High Court of Tanzania in Dar es Salaam, contrary to Article 7(1)(d) of the Charter; On reparations Pecuniary reparations x. Does not grant the Applicant's prayer for damages arising from material loss of income, loss of life plan, financial losses incurred by himself and his wife, and for legal costs incurred in the proceedings before the domestic courts; xi. Does not grant the Applicant’s prayer for damages for moral prejudice suffered by his wife, mother, sisters, and brothers; xii. Grants the Applicant's prayer for reparation for the prejudice suffered as a result of the violations found and awards him the sum of Tanzanian Shillings Five Million Seven Hundred and Twenty Five Thousand (TZS 5, 725,000); xiii. Orders the Respondent compensation, within State to pay the six (6) months from above the sum date tax free as of notification a fair of this judgment, failing which, it will be required to pay interest on arrears calculated 51