173. Even though the Court considers that a judgment
sufficient form of reparation,
in itself, can constitute a
it can suo motu, order such other measures of
satisfaction as it deems fit.
174. In the instant case, the Court considers that there is need to emphasise and
raise
awareness
reparations
for
as
the
regards
the
violations
Respondent
established
State's
with
a
obligations
view
to
to make
enhancing
implementation of the judgment. To ensure that the judgment is publicised as
widely as possible, the Court
finds that the publication of the judgment on the
merits on the websites of the Judiciary and the Ministry of Constitutional and
Legal Affairs to be accessible
for at least one (1) year
after the date
of
publication, is an appropriate additional measure of satisfaction.
IX.
COSTS
175. In accordance with Rule 30 of the Rules, "Unless otherwise decided by the
Court, each party shall bear its own costs".
176. The Court reiterates, as has already been established, that reparations may
include legal costs and other costs incurred in international proceedings.™ It is
up to the Applicant to provide justification for the sums claimed.*?
Armand Guéhi v. United Republic of Tanzania, § 194; Reverend Christopher Mtikila v. United Republic of
Tanzania (reparations) §§ 45 and 46 (5) and Beneficiaries of late Norbert Zongo, (reparations) (2015) 1
AFCLR 258 § 95; Lucien Ikili Rashidi v. United Republic of Tanzania (merits and reparations), §151; Wilfred
Onyango Nganyi v United Republic of Tanzania (reparations) § 86; Alex Thomas v United Republic of
Tanzania (reparations), § 74.
8’Armand Guéhi v United Republic of Tanzania (merits and reparations) §188; and Beneficiaries of late
Norbert Zongo v. Burkina Faso (reparations) § 77-93.
=8A4rmand Guéhi v United Republic of Tanzania (merits and reparations) §197.
47