relevant rules and regulations of the Respondent governing the said recruitment/selection exercise. 6. In the alternative to relief 5 above, AN ORDER of the Honorable Court setting aside the recruitment exercise conducted or caused to be conducted by the Respondent in year 2016 for the position of Director, Public Sector Operations of the Defendant on the ground that the said recruitment exercise was flawed by fundamental irregularities and fraud. 7. The sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) as the cost of this lawsuit. 8. The sum of Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000.00) as damages for the wrongful termination of the Plaintiff’s appointment by the Defendant. 9. 10% interest per annum of the total judgment sum until the said sum is liquidated. AND FOR SUCH FURTHER OR OTHER ORDERS as this Honorable Court may deem fit to make in the circumstances. The Respondent’s defense The Respondent denies the Applicant’s narration of facts and states that the Applicant was an early candidate of EBID disciplinary committee on account of gross misconduct. That as a probationary employee he breached his duty of fidelity and confidentiality by speaking directly to a third party in unflattering terms and making derisive and negative comments concerning a decision taken by management of EBID. 8 | P a g e