which resulted in the lawful termination of the Applicant’s appointment in accordance with the Rules and Regulations governing his employment. The Respondents list the acts of misconduct as follows: i) The disgraceful encounter with AMBA Immobilizer. ii) The Hillacondji Boarder violence in 2014 which resulted in the Respondent’s Bank being involved by mobilizing resources to intervene and save the Applicant and his family from a violent incident involving the Applicant. iii) A mission to Cote d’Ivoire where the Applicant proceeded to embark on leave without notice knowing how important his duty was to the Ivorian authorities. iv) The Applicant’s blatant indiscipline towards the management of the Respondent’s Bank which culminated in his appointment being terminated. In view of the Respondent’s defense, it submitted that the Applicant’s action lacks merit and that he was rightfully terminated in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the bank and therefore not entitled to the reliefs sought. The Respondent therefore are seeking the following: a. An order dismissing the Applicant’s application with substantial costs. b. An order compelling the Applicant to return the Respondent all properties including laptop/computer unlawfully detained by the Applicant since the lawful termination of his appointment. ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION 10 | P a g e