c) that the 4th Respondent only deposited a declaration under Article 34(6) of the Protocol after the commencement of these proceedings. 22. The following were distilled as points of disagreement and which now require this Court’s determination: 1) whether the Court has jurisdiction to entertain this Reference. 2) whether the issues as presented were justiciable. 3) whether the Application discloses a cause of action against the 1st and 4th Respondents. 4) whether the Applicant has locus standi to present the Reference. 5) Whether the delay by the 2nd to 5th Respondents to deposit their respective declarations is a violation of Articles 5, 6, 7, 8(1)(c), 126 and 130 of the Treaty; Articles 1(2), 7, 13, 26, 62, 65 and 66 of the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights (the Charter) and Articles 1, 3, 5, and 34 of the Protocol on the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Establishment of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the Protocol). 6) Whether the 1st Respondent has a duty under the Treaty, the Charter or the Protocol to compel and/or supervise the 2nd, 3rd and 5th Respondents to deposit declarations under Article 34(6) of the Protocol. 7) Whether the parties are entitled to the remedies sought. 15 | P a g e