ii) Malawi: Accepts the competence of the Court to receive cases under Article 5(3) of the Protocol. (signed: 09/09/2008 and deposited: 09/10/2008); iii) Mali: Accepts competence of the Court to receive cases in accordance with Article 5(3) of the Protocol. (signed: 05/02/2010 and deposited: 19/02/2010); iv) Tanzania: The Court may entitle Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs) with observer status before the Commission and individuals to institute cases directly before it in accordance with Article 34(6) of the Protocol. However, without prejudice to Article 5(3) of the aforesaid Protocol, such entitlement is only to be granted to such NGOs and individuals once all domestic legal remedies have been exhausted and in adherence to the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania. (signed: 09/03/2010 and deposited: 29/03/2010); The 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th Respondents as other Partner States of the East African Community have no reason whatsoever to withhold their deposits of declaration. h) The 1st Respondent being the Chief Executive Officer of the East African Community is mandated to play supervisory roles over all the Partner States of the East African community to ensure that they comply with the Treaty. i) The Secretary General of the East African Community has failed to supervise the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th Respondents to ensure that they deposit their respective declarations in order to make them conform to the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community, the 6|Page