Partner State has “promoted” and “protected” human and peoples’ rights in accordance with the provisions of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the Applicant is quite within the Treaty in seeking such interpretation and the Court quite within its initial Jurisdiction in doing so and it will not be shy in embracing that initial Jurisdiction. We should conclude this question by adding that “Human Rights” is defined in Black’s Law Dictionary – Eighth Edition as: “the freedoms, immunities and benefits that, according to modern values (esp. at an international level), all human beings should be able to claim as a matter of right in the society in which they live” 24. When the Applicant seeks to know whether the Subject’s arrest and detention was a breach of the Treaty, she is not asking the Court to interpret the enforcement of any human right available to the Subject, and that is why she withdrew her prayer for “an order that the said Lieutenant colonel Seveline Rugigana Ngabo be released from illegal detention”, because this court would obviously have no such Jurisdiction. All she is seeking are certain declarations within the mandate of the Court and we have said why such Jurisdiction to make such declarations exists. REFERENCE NO.8 OF 2010 Page 17