(i) That the Subject was arrested for being “suspected [to have] committed crimes against National Security (sic).” And that on 21st January 2011, the Military Prosecution lodged its case for Preventive Detention and it was only on 28th January 2011 that the Military High Court ruled that “the detention of Lieutenant Colonel Ngabo from the date he was arrested until the date his case was brought before the Court was irregular and contravened the provisions of Articles 90 to 100 of the Rwandan Code of Criminal Procedure.” (ii) That since that date, the Military High Court for reasons of gravity of the alleged crimes committed by the Subject, has continued to extend the Preventive Detention Order for regular periods and the Subject is detained in a known Military Prison and exercises all his rights, including visitation by his family, lawyers and friends. Further, it is the 2nd Respondent’s case that: (iii) The Reference was filed in breach of Article 30(2) of the Treaty and it was time- barred. (iv) The Court has no Jurisdiction to deal with Human Rights issues and has no Jurisdiction to deal with issues that are REFERENCE NO.8 OF 2010 Page 10

Select target paragraph3