(i)
That the Subject was arrested for being “suspected [to
have] committed crimes against National Security (sic).”
And that on 21st January 2011, the Military Prosecution
lodged its case for Preventive Detention and it was only on
28th January 2011 that the Military High Court ruled that
“the detention of Lieutenant Colonel Ngabo from the
date he was arrested until the date his case was brought
before the Court was irregular and contravened the
provisions of Articles 90 to 100 of the Rwandan Code of
Criminal Procedure.”
(ii)
That since that date, the Military High Court for reasons of
gravity of the alleged crimes committed by the Subject,
has continued to extend the Preventive Detention Order
for regular periods and the Subject is detained in a known
Military Prison and exercises all his rights, including
visitation by his family, lawyers and friends.
Further, it is the 2nd Respondent’s case that:
(iii) The Reference was filed in breach of Article 30(2) of the
Treaty and it was time- barred.
(iv) The Court has no Jurisdiction to deal with Human Rights
issues and has no Jurisdiction to deal with issues that are
REFERENCE NO.8 OF 2010
Page 10