Admissibility
iii.
Dismisses the objections to the admissibility of the Application;
iv.
Declares the Application admissible;
Merits
v.
Finds that the Respondent State violated the right to life protected
under Article 4 of the Charter;
vi.
Finds that the Respondent State violated the right to an effective
remedy, protected by Article 7(1)(a) of the Charter, read together
with Article 1 of the Charter;
vii.
Finds that the Respondent State violated the Applicants’ right to
enjoy the best attainable state of physical and mental health,
protected by Article 16 of the Charter;
viii. Finds that the Respondent State violated the Applicants’ right to a
general satisfactory environment conducive to development,
protected under Article 24 of the Charter;
ix.
Finds that the Respondent State violated the right to receive
information, protected by Article 9(1) of the Charter;
Reparations
Pecuniary Reparations
x.
Orders the Respondent State to establish, within one (1) year of
the notification of this Judgment, in consultation with the victims, a
compensation fund to be financed with the amounts received from
TRAFIGURA,
and
additional
resources
provided
by
the
Respondent State, as necessary, taking into account the census
of victims to be conducted as ordered in the present Judgment;
xi.
Orders the Respondent State to pay each of the Applicants one
(1) symbolic CFA Franc for moral prejudice.
64
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents