was granted by the Court and the case adjourned to the 25th of May 2015 for hearing and the motion for default judgment struck out at the Plaintiffs instance. 5.3. Defendants Case: Following the grant of the Defendants application for extension of time to file her statement of Defence, the Defendant did so and averred as follows; In response to the Plaintiffs’ statement of facts, the Defendant state that no person(s) were arrested and/or detained by the Nigerian Police, Nigerian Military or men of the AEPB as alleged by the Plaintiffs. That if at all the alleged three girls were arrested by the Nigerian Police and men of the AEPB, neither the 1st, nor 2nd to the 4th Plaintiffs were, among them; the Plaintiffs therefore lack the legal capacity to bring a complaint on their behalf. The Defendant states that the 1st Plaintiff did at no time have the alleged experience with the Nigerian Police, Nigerian Army or the men of the AEPB. That the 1st Plaintiff is hiding under the canopy of human right activism to campaign for the legalization of prostitution in public places in the Federal Capital Territory. That the 1st plaintiff is actively involved in the coordination and conduct of the trade or business of professional commercial sex workers (prostitution) in the FCT. 14