158. The Court also takes into account the principle that there must be a causal link between the violation alleged and the alleged injury and puts the burden of proof on the Applicant who must provide evidence to justify his request.43 159. The Court recalls that it has also established that “reparation must, as far as possible, erase all the consequences of the wrongful act and restore the state which would presumably have existed if that act had not been committed”. Moreover, depending on the particular circumstances of each case, reparation measures must include restitution, compensation, rehabilitation of the victim and measures to ensure the non-repetition of violations, taking into account the circumstances of each case.44 160. Furthermore, the Court reiterates that it has established already that reparation measures for damage resulting from human rights violations must take account of the circumstances of each case and the Court's assessment is made on a case-by-case basis.45 161. The Court will consider requests for reparations bearing in mind that it cannot order reparations measures based on allegations for which no human rights violations have been found. 162. In the instant case, the Court notes that it has found that the law on the HJC violates Article 26 of the Charter; that Article 413(3) of the criminal code violates Article 9(2) of the Charter and Article 19 of the ICCPR. It also found a violation of Article 30 of the Protocol by virtue of the Respondent’s failure to comply with the Court's decisions. Ibid, XYZ v. Republic of Benin, § 140. Ibid, § 141. 45 Ibid, § 142. 43 44 42