g) the action for damages against a Community institution or an official of the Community for any action or omission in the exercise of official functions. The subject matter that the Court has competence to adjudicate upon clearly does not include the enforcement of its judgments. The jurisprudence of the Court amply supports this position. In the decided case of KARIM MEISSA WADE v. REPUBLIC OF SENEGAL (General List No. ECW/CCJ/APP/09/13 and Judgement No. ECW/CCJ/JUD/19/13, this Court ruled that where it has delivered a judgment, it is up to the parties to pursue the enforcement of same in accordance with the provisions of the Supplementary Protocol of 19 January 2005 and the Supplementary Act on Sanctions of 17 February 2012. (SEE ECOWAS OFFICIAL JOURNAL VOL. 60 pg. 76) Therefore, the Court declared that it lacks jurisdiction to entertain the matter. Again in the absence of jurisdiction ratione materiae on cases seeking for the enforcement of the Court’s judgments, the judgment of this Court in the Suit No. ECW/CCJ/APP/12/15 between LES ETABLISSEMENTS VAMO & ORS v. BENIN is instructive. In that case, the applicants requested the Court to order the enforcement of its judgment dated 3rd July 2013, with reference number ECW/CCJ/JUD/07/13 between AZIAGBEDE KOKOU & 33 ORS ETC. v. REPUBLIC OF TOGO, the Court ruled that it lacks jurisdiction to enforce its own judgments (see ECW/CCJ/JUD/29/16). What then is the fate of a judgment creditor in this Honourable Court? In Article 24, the Supplementary Protocol (A.SP.1/01/05) on the Community Court of Justice reproduced above provides methods of implementation of 14