IV.10- Article 35 of the Rules of the Community Court of Justice indicates the time the defendant is to present his defence, the contents of defence and the ability to extend the submission deadline; The applicant criticized the defendant for not having presented its defence brief on time and not having received an extension; The analysis of documents filed shows that the application, and that for expedited procedure were served to the defendant on 26 September 2014 and that the latter did not find it necessary to reply until 4 December 2014; It appears that the statements by the Republic of Benin were not filed within the periods prescribed by the Rules; But respect for the adversarial principle requires the other party to be heard; Then, it is obvious that the late filing of the defendant’s statements did not cause any damage to the applicant in that his case was examined within a reasonable time; For all these reasons, it is not appropriate to grant the motion of Mr AMOUSSOU tending to move for the foreclosure of the statement filed by the Republic of Benin; - As to the application of Mr AMOUSSOU IV.11- Mr AMOUSSOU Georges Constant came before this Court with an application primarily to hold that the retention exerted on his person from 16 to 17 July 2010 by the Independent Judicial Commission of Inquiry constitutes an arbitrary arrest and order accordingly his release; IV.12- The Republic of Benin rejected the application by relying on the authority of res judicata; IV.13- The Republic of Benin argued that the complaints made by Mr AMOUSSOU against the judgment of 6 March 2014 to find out the inaccuracies and failure to adjudicate should have made him to exercise the remedies allowed by the Rules of Court, that the judgment not been the subject by the parties for appropriate remedy, it has acquired the authority of res judicata; 9