IV.14- Mr AMOUSSOU argued that no authority of res judicata can at this stage of the proceedings be recognized in this case because of the obvious inaccuracies in it and the failure to adjudicate on arguments of public order; IV.15- According to Mr AMOUSSOU in his own application, this Court has delivered a judgment on 6 March 2014 against the Republic of Benin; IV.16- It therefore appears from the foregoing that Mr AMOUSSOU sued the Republic of Benin to this Court to hear judgment on the arbitrary nature of his arrest, police custody and detention, that after this procedure, the Court issued on 6 March 2014 the judgment that is as follows: “Ruling publicly, contradictorily, in area of human rights and as last resort; As to the form: - Find that the Court has jurisdiction to entertain the application for violation of human rights presented by Mr Constant AMOUSSOU against the Republic of Benin, said accordingly admits the application. As to the merit: - Notes that the Republic of Benin has not violated any human right to the detriment of Mr Constant AMOUSSOU. - Consequently rejects all claims by the Applicant Constant AMOUSSOU. - Leave the costs for each party to bear”; IV.17- In paragraphs 41 and 44 of it’s reasoning, the Court finds that neither the applicant's arrest or detention are arbitrary; IV.18- It is easy to see that this judgment was delivered between the same parties namely Mr Constant AMOUSSOU and the Republic of Benin, was on the same cause that is to say the ICC-Services and has the same subject in particular the arrest, custody and detention of the applicant; IV.19- The claims of the applicant in this procedure are not new to the Court; 10