On admissibility iii. Dismisses the objections on the admissibility of the Application; iv. Declares that the Application is admissible; On the merits v. Finds that the Respondent State has not violated Articles 7, 7(1 )(b) and (c) of the Charter with respect to the claims that the Applicant's rights to be assisted by an interpreter, to have access to a lawyer, to consular assistance, in relation to the allegation that the investigation was improper and insufficient, and to be presumed innocent were breached; vi. Finds that the Respondent State has not violated Article 14 of the Charter in relation to the allegation that the Applicant's property was disposed of by agents of the Respondent State; vii. Finds that the Respondent State has violated Article 5 of the Charter for failing to provide the Applicant with food; viii. Finds that the Respondent State has violated Article 7( 1)(d) of the Charter with respect to the allegation that the Applicant's trial was unduly delayed; ix. Finds that the Respondent State has violated Article 1 of the Charter. On reparations x. Does not grant the Applicant's prayer for the Court to quash his conviction and sentence, and order his release; xi. Does not grant the Applicant's prayers related to compensation for moral prejudice; xii. Does not grant the Applicant's prayer to be paid material damages for monetary loss; xiii. Does not grant the Applicant's prayers related to payment of legal fees incurred in the course of domestic proceedings; xiv. Does not grant the Applicant's prayers related to the guarantee of non- repetition and publication of this Judgment; xv. Grants the Applicant the sum of US Dollars Five Hundred ($500) for being subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment; xvi. Grants the Applicant the sum of US Dollars Two Thousand ($2,000) for not being tried within a reasonable time and the anguish that ensued therefrom; 50