145. The Court reiterates its position that, as regards the income lost due to the proceedings before the High Court*® and the claim for lawyers’ fees during domestic proceedings, such loss should be proven before this Court with evidence of financial returns that could have been realised as well as evidence of payments to his counsel. In the instant case, the prejudice resulting from the lengthy judicial proceedings could also have been supported by proof of payment of lawyers' fees, as well as procedural and other related costs. The Court notes that, the Applicant provided no such evidence in support of his claims. Consequently, these claims are dismissed. 146. With respect to the claim for compensation based on the disruption of his life plan, chronic illness and poor health, the Court notes that the Applicant's allegation is simply a general statement that is not supported by any evidence. Consequently, this claim is also dismissed ii Moral prejudice a. 147 Moral prejudice suffered by the Applicant In his claims for reparations, the Applicant argues that he suffered undue stress from the lack of provision of legal assistance during the various stages of his case, as a result of the failure of the Respondent State to recognise the rights, duties and freedoms enshrined in the Charter. The Applicant further argues that the Respondent State's failure to try him within a reasonable time and provide him with equal protection of the law and its violation of his dignity by degrading him through torture, caused him serious stress. 148 . The Applicant adds that he suffered a wide range of injuries during his arrest and sickness since his incarceration such as hypertension and cardiomegaly. He further submits that he lost his social status and standing in the community 4Lucien Ikili Rashidi v. United Republic of Tanzania (merits and reparations), § 126. 40