The same could not be said of a minor needing the protection of the State, as was the situation in the instant case. 38. The Commission should not, therefore, be taken to have laid down a hard and fast rule that whenever a Complainant finds himself outside the jurisdiction, the inescapable conclusion should be that the requirement of exhaustion of local remedies mandated under Article 56.5 does not apply. Holding For these reasons, the Commission th After reconsidering its decision on admissibility as taken at its 26 Ordinary Session in Kigali, Rwanda, Declares the communication inadmissible for non-exhaustion of local remedies, having ascertained that the Complainant neither resorted to local remedies, nor did he bring the alleged violations to the attention of the Respondent State. rd th Tripoli, Libya, 23 April to 7 May 2001.