/or their Dependants.See: Mulezi Vs. Democratic Republic of Congo (2004) AHLR 3, where the Respondent State was direct to conduct through investigation into the killing of the complainant’s wife, and to bring to justice those responsible for these violations, and pay appropriate compensation for these violations. See: Sankara Vs. Burkina Faso (2006) AHLR 23. vi. Victims of arbitrary killings are entitled to adequate compensation from the State where the violation was committed, this is aside from conducting, prompt, transparent and effective investigations and punish the offenders. This Court was referred to its decision in Karou Vs. Republic of Niger (2010) CCJ L R (PT3)1 where it held that Hadijatou Mani Karaou was a victim of slavery and that the Republic of Niger is to blame for the inaction of its administrative and judicial authorities. vii. The case of Dorcas Afolalu Vs. Federal Republic of Nigeria (unreported) Suit No: ECW/CCJ/APP/04/12 which according to him is at all fours with this case, this Court awarded compensation and directed the prosecution of those involved in the violence that led to the death of the deceased. The Applicant concluded that “ having regard to the inexplicable negligence of the Defendant, the brutal and callous manner of the death of his 19 years old son of the Applicant by drowning, following the failure of the Defendant to provide safety measures the removal of the body of the deceased like a fish by a local diver, the 12