records to enable him defend himself; his defence based on the fact that the Prosecutor before the District Court had a conflict of interest with the victim of the armed robbery, to be considered by the Judge; not to be convicted solely on the basis of the inconsistent testimony of a single witness in the absence of any identification parade; and to have his alibi defence given serious consideration by the Respondent State’s police and judicial authorities; By majority of seven for and two against, Judge Elsie N. THOMPSON BEN ACHOUR x) and Judge Rafaa dissenting: Declares that the Respondent State has not violated Article 7 of the Charter and/or Article 14 of the Covenant as regards the allegation that the sentence was not pronounced at a Public Hearing; xi) Rules that the Applicant’s prayer to be released from prison is refused; Unanimously: xii) | Orders the Respondent State to take reasonable time frame to remedy all all appropriate measures within a the violations established, excluding a reopening of the trial, and to inform the Court of the measure so taken within six (6) months from the date of this Judgment ; xiii) | Reserves its ruling on the prayers for other forms of reparation and on costs; xiv) | Orders the Applicant to submit to the Court his brief on other forms of reparation within thirty days from the date of this Judgment; also orders the Respondent State to submit to the Court its response on other forms of reparation within thirty days of receipt of the Applicant's brief. 63 | CNe