“i) That the Applicant has not evoked (sic) the jurisdiction of the African Court;
ii) That the Application has not met the admissibility requirements stipulated under paragraphs
1 to 7 of Rule 40 of the Rules of Court and Articles 56 and 6.2 of its Protocol;
iii) That the Application be dismissed pursuant to Rule 38 of the Rules of Court;
iv) Order the Applicant to pay costs.
With regard to the merits, to rule:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
vii)
viii)
ix)
that the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania did not illegally arrest the
Applicant;
that the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania did not illegally detain the
Applicant:
that the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania did not violate the right of
the Applicant to be represented by a lawyer;
that the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania did not violate the right of
the Applicant to defend himself;
that the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania did not violate the
Applicant’s right to equality before the law;
that the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania did not discriminate against
the Applicant;
that the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania did not infringe Section 311
of the Tanzanian Criminal Code;
that Applicant's conviction based on the testimony of a single witness is in conformity
with the law;
that the prosecution witnesses in the initial criminal case No. 397/1997 did not make
contradictory submissions
x)
that the Applicant’s conviction to thirty years term of imprisonment for armed robbery
is in
xi)
;
conformity with the law; and
order the Applicant to pay costs”.
At the Public Hearing:
“We pray to proceed with our prayers with regard to preliminary objections and jurisdiction of this
Honourable Court. We pray the Court to admit the preliminary objections on the jurisdiction and
admissibility of the Application itself and declare as follows.
That the Applicant in his Application
has not evoked the jurisdiction of the Honourable Court.
Two, that the Application has not met the admissibility requirements stipulated under Rule 40(6)
of the Rules of Court and Article 56 (6) of the Charter.
Three, that the Application
has not met the admissibility requirement stipulated in 40(6) of the
°
ae
©