basis of the foregoing analysis this Court holds that it has the competence to hear and determine this application. ISSUE 2: Whether the application is admissible. On the issue of whether the application is admissible, the Court notes that the Applicant filed his application pursuant to the following provisions: i. Article 11 of the Protocol of the Court (A/P1/7/91) ii. Article 33 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court iii. Article 7 of the ECOWAS General Conditions on the privileges of ECOWAS Community Staff & Revised Treaty iv. Article 4(2), 9 and 78 (5) of the ECOWAS Bank of Investment and Development Staff Rules and Regulations. Article 11 prescribes the mode of bringing applications before the Court and Article 33 of the Rules of Procedure provides for the form an application of this kind as referenced in Article 11 of the Protocol. Article 7 of the ECOWAS General Conditions on the privileges of ECOWAS Community Staff & Revised Treaty is self-explanatory. Article 4(2), 9 and 78 (5) of the ECOWAS Bank of Investment and Development Staff Rules and Regulations which deals privileges and immunities, separation from services and appeals for arbitration. The Court notes that with the exception of reference to Article 4 (2) 9 and 78 (5) of the ECOWAS Bank of Investment and Development Staff Rules and Regulations all the other references are not applicable to the present application. However, this does not mean that the application is not admissible because the Court notes that the Applicant has sought to rely on Article 4(2), 9 and 78 (5) of the ECOWAS Bank of Investment and Development Staff Rules and 13 | P a g e