'000?94 84. The Court therefore finds that the Respondent State has violated Article 7(1Xc) of the Charter. VIII. REPARAT!ONS 85.The Applicant prays the Court to find a violation of his rights and set him free and order such other measures or remedies as it may deem fit. 86. On the other hand, the Respondent State prays the Court to find that it has not violated any of the rights of the Applicant and that the Application shoutd be dismissed. ST.Article 27(1) of the Protocol provides that "if the Court finds that there has been violation of a human or peoples' rights, it shall make appropriate orders to remedy the violation, including the payment of fair compensation or reparation." 88. ln this respect, Rule 63 of the Rules provides that "the Court shall rule on the request for reparation... by the same decision establishing the violation of a human and peoples' right or, if the circumstances so require, by a separate decision." A. Pecuniary Reparations 89.The Court notes its finding in paragraph 84 above that the Respondent State violated the Applicant's right to a fair trial due to the fact that he was not afforded free legal aid in the course of the criminal proceedings against him. ln this regard, the Court recalls its position on State responsibility in Reverend Chistopher R. Mtikila v. United Republic of Tanzania, that "any violation of an international obligation that has caused harm entails the obligation to provide adequate reparation'.23 23 See Application No. 01 1/201 1 . Ruling ol 13tOBl14 (Reparations), Reverend Christopher Mtikila v. Tanzania, $ 27 and Application No. 010/20'15. Judgment ot 11105118, Amii Ramadhani v. The United Republic of Tanzania (Merits), $ 83 '2r