31. The Republic of Togo claimed that these facts do not constitute acts of torture, arbitrary detention and the violation of the fundamental rights of Plaintiff/Applicant; 32. Defendant further claimed that regarding acts of torture, it was after the December 08, 2016 case was filed that these alleged acts were brought to its attention; it immediately ordered an investigation into the matter, pursuant to Article 12 of the UN Convention against torture; and that the investigation revealed that the allegations of torture are unfounded, because the security agent fingered denied them all; 33. Furthermore, Defendant averred that Plaintiff/Applicant did not bring any proof for the allegations that he made regarding torture; also, the medical certificate tendered dated 2016, that is eleven (11) years after the alleged facts; that the said document cannot serve as proof for the alleged acts of torture ; 34. Regarding the allegation of arbitrary detention, the investigation revealed that Plaintiff/Applicant was detained on the basis of a committal order issued against him, by the investigating judge, who took charge of the case; that it was a false claim for him to declare that he was detained illegally; 35. Finally, Defendant claimed that Plaintiff/Applicant’s right to work was not violated as his sack was sequel to a jail sentenced that was confirmed by the Court of Appeal in Lomé 10