117. The Respondent relies on article 92 of the Rules of the Court as its defense. c. Form of Orders Sought: 118. The Respondent sought from the Court: 1) With regards to the form, to: i. Declare inadmissible the action brought by Tahirou Djibo and others, as no violation of human rights by the State of Niger has been established; 2) On the merit, to: ii. Dismiss the application for Revision; iii. Order the Applicants to pay the expenses. The Reply 119. By means of Reply, the Applicants responded to the preliminary objection of inadmissibility raised by the Respondent, reiterating the arguments set out in the Originating Application. VIII – JURISDICTION 120. Having the Court assumed its jurisdiction to judge the case under the terms of Article 9 (4) of Additional Protocol A/SP.1/01/05 on the Court of Justice of the Community, the same remains in the case of Revision, under the provisions of articles 92, 93 and 94, all of the Court's Rules of Procedure 22