2013 pag.151paragraph 36) and ECW/CCJ/JUD/03/07 delivered in case ECW/CCJ/APP/05/06 between Sieur Moussa Leo Keita versus State of Mali. In this sense, it is not for the Court to address the invalidities generated in criminal proceedings - unless there is an claim of the infringement of a human right - especially when they have already been dealt with at national level, such as the present case under penalty of breach of the principle of res judicata, as, as has been pointed out, this Court is not an appeal body against judgments pronounced in domestic courts. That is why this Court also has ruled “That in order to make his cause prosper the applicant must indicate the human rights being violated and prove the such violations. “-Cf. Judgment of 23 April 2015 in ECW/CCJ/APP/19/14 between Tidjani Abdoulkarim and Others against the Republic of Niger. In the present case, the facts claimed by the applicant not only do not specify the human rights allegedly infringed by the State of Burkina Faso, but also from the analysis of the facts, this Court did not uncover the violation of any human rights. Thus, since the infringement of any human rights has not been alleged nor demonstrated, this Court has no jurisdiction to hear the case. 6. DECISION In the light of the foregoing, the Court finds that it has no jurisdiction to hear the case and, consequently, it dismisses the application initiating proceedings as inadmissible. Expenses: That the applicant shall bear the costs in accordance with the Article 66 (1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice. This judgment was declared and pronounced in a public court hearing held in Abuja by the Court of Justice of the Community on 26th of September 2019. 15