W4 JARISDICTION 3t. The facts constituting the present application substantially relate to several allegations of violations of the rights of the deceased by the agents of the Respondent. The Applicants claim that these facts reveal several breaches of the Afrigan Chartel particularly, the rlght to life, prohibition of tor,ture, presumption of innocence and the right to human dignity. 32. The competence of the Court to enterta-in cases bordering on human rights violation is provided under Article 9 of the 2OA5 Supplementary Protocol on the Court. Article g (4) gives the Court the jurisdiction to determine cases of violation of human rights that occur in any Member State, 33. Considering the circumstances of the instant case, we hold the view that this application is centered on human rights violation and thus falls within the ambit of this Court's jurisdiction. VIII. ADMISSIBILITY 34. The jurisprudence of this Court reveals that even where jurisdiction has been established, a case of violation of human right is only admissible under certain defined strictures which every Applicant must satisflz before his or her case is admitted. To this end, Article iO(d) provides that"Access to the court is open to individuals on applicationfor relieffor violation of their human rights, the submission of applicationfor"which shall; mctde whilst the same matter has been court for adjudication ". 10 ) IVot be anonyt?xot,ts; nor ii) Be instittied before another international