- The right to have a say in one’s testify against oneself, own notably the case and not be coerced right to bring counter to evidence during trial; « - The right to presumption of innocence; - The right to be tried by an independent and impartial court; - The right to effective remedy; - The right to appeal in case of imposition of sentence; - The right to equality of judicial means and resource between the defence and the prosecution. 34. It is for the reasons outlined above that the Applicants ask the Court to find that their rights to freedom of movement and to travel without hindrance, are violated by the Republic of Senegal; That having been denied their rights as to: travelling outside the national territory, presumption of innocence, fair trial, equality of citizens before ~ the law and before the courtg,.2V the Republic of Senegal, they ask the — eae! Court: | | To adjudge and declare: - That the proceedings instituted against the Applicants were discriminatory and selective; - That the measure of ban from going out of the national territory as decided by the incompetent authorities was made without any legal basis, in the absence of any notification, and therefore arbitrary; - That the said violations of their human rights must cease; and furthermore, To find: - That there is violation of their immunity from being sued to court and from prosecution, as well as violation of their privileges deriving from’ their status as former Ministers of the Republic of Senegai; 10