The above prayers are contained in the Statement of Claim; but other prayers were added in the Claimant’s written submissions without leave for amendment as required by Rule 40 of the Court’s Rules of Procedure. Therefore, we are bound by the Rules in resolving the instant Claim and we will only consider prayers contained in the Statement of the Claim. As to whether the Claimant is entitled to remedies sought, Counsel for the Respondent submitted that the Claimant was legally employed with a binding initial appointment of 3 years, with subsequent short term contracts and was provided notice of non-renewal of contract. Counsel for the Respondent contended that the contract duration was specified to last at least 2 years and the Claimant was given termination notice. Counsel for the Respondent asserted that the Claimant had never complained about the duration of her contract before the expiry of the initial contract which ran from October, 2008 to June, 2010. He finally submitted that there was no wrongful termination and that, subsequently, the Claimant is not entitled to any remedy. X. DECISION ON THE ISSUE NO.4 We have given due consideration to the rival pleadings and submissions from both Parties and at this juncture, we have this to say: CLAIM NO.1 OF 2012 Page 27