Act, the Applicant as a whistle-blower expected a reward of 5% of the net liquidated sum of money upon the disclosure to the IGG. Both the Whistle-blowers Protection Act and Inspectorate of Government Act, 2002 provide for such a reward;  On 22nd October, 2012, the Applicant wrote to the IGG seeking an update on the implementation of the IGG’s recommendations and more specifically the reward provided for under the Whistleblowers Protection Act. In her response dated 14th December 2012 to the Applicant, the Inspector General of Government advised the Applicant to approach the Attorney General of Uganda who, in his legal capacity of legal representative of Government, has the obligation and necessary resources to implement the IGG’s recommendations and to satisfy the Applicant’s Claim;  In the light of the above advice, the Applicant wrote to the Attorney General requesting to be updated on the status of the implementation of the IGG’s report and recommendations but todate, the Attorney General has never responded to that letter. Instead, the Applicant discovered various letters with contradictory positions in regard to the aforesaid implementation and no appropriate action has so far been taken with regard to the implementation of the IGG’s report and recommendations;  Later on by letter dated 8th July, 2013, the IGG overturned her recommendations and considered that there was no need to recover the amount of USD17,826,038.94. The Applicant alleged that, the turnabout by the Inspectorate of the Reference No. 5 of 2013 Page 6