Commission, once Reference No. 2 of 2014 is heard and determined on its merits. That, in our view, is the best course of action in the wider interests of justice. 31. Having disposed of the main issues in the Application, we do not see any reason to delve into the issue whether Prof. Ndetije is the legal representative of UPRONA Party and whether Mr. Nshimirimana was properly appointed to act in these proceedings. Conclusion 32. Land is an emotive issue in the East African region and Courts generally bear that fact in mind when settling disputes tied to land, but as regards the Application before us, we have said why we see no merit in it and we shall dismiss it as prayed by the Respondents. 33. Regarding the costs, let the same abide the outcome of Reference No. 2 of 2014. Orders accordingly. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT ARUSHA THIS …..DAY OF …………….2014 ………………... ISAAC LENAOLA DEPUTY PRINCIPAL JUDGE ……………….. *JOHN MKWAWA JUDGE (RETIRED) ……………………… FAUSTIN NTEZILYAYO JUDGE *NB: Hon.Mr.Justice John Mkwawa participated in the hearing and deliberations leading to this Ruling. He retired from the Court on 26th June 2014. 12