a) An Applicant must show a prima facie case with a
probability of success;
b) An injunction will not be granted unless the Applicant might
otherwise suffer irreparable injury which would not be
compensated by award of damages; and
c) When the Court is in doubt, it will decide the application on
the balance of convenience.
18. Since the Giella and the American Cyanamid Co cases, the
requirements for granting or refusing temporary injunctions
have been subject to various interpretations when their
application
was
invoked
before
courts.
While
reviewing
conditions for grant of temporary injunctions, this Court
found, in Mbidde Foundation Ltd & Rt. Hon. Margaret
Zziwa Vs The Secretary General of the East African
Community & The Attorney General of Uganda, EACJ
Application No. 5 of 2014, that one authority which
convincingly sums up the present law on grant of interlocutory
injunctions is Halisbury’s Laws of England, Vol. 11 (2009), 5th
Edition, para. 385. It states that: “On an application for an
interlocutory injunction the court must be satisfied that
there is a serious question to be tried. The material
available to court at the hearing of the application must
disclose
that
the
claimant
has
real
prospects
for
succeeding in his claim for a permanent injunction at the
trial. The former requirement that the claimant should
establish a strong prima facie case for a permanent
8