pending before a lawful Court in Rwanda and which Court
is yet to issue a verdict on the said matter.
That in any event, the EACJ should only be considered as a
Court of last resort when National Courts are unwilling or
unable to render justice to the people in their
jurisdictions,otherwise,it will attract millions of cases that
would ,in normal circumstance, be competently handled
by Local Courts in Partner States.
(v)
The Government of Rwanda has at all times acted by the
principles of good governance, including adherence to the
principles of democracy, the rule of Law, Social Justice and
maintenance of accepted Standards of Human Rights and
so the Reference is without merit and should either be
struck off or dismissed.
ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION
16. From the contested matters set out above and from the agreed
issues as framed during the Scheduling Conference, the
following questions ought to be determined:
(a)
Whether the East African Court of Justice’s (EACJ) First
Instance Division has Jurisdiction to entertain the
Reference herein.
REFERENCE NO.8 OF 2010
Page 11