As to jurisdiction: i. Declares that it has jurisdiction. As to admissibility: ii. Declares that the Application is inadmissible with regards to the first Applicant but declares admissible the Application as it relates to the second, third and fourth Applicants on the allegation of violation of their rights to association and peaceful assembly. As to merits: iii. Declares that the Respondent violated the second, third and fourth Applicants’ right to peaceful assembly contrary to Article 11 of the African Charter; iv. Declares that the Respondent is not in violation of the Applicants’ rights to association under Article 10 of the African Charter; v. Declares that the Respondent has a duty to ensure the protection of the assembly of the 28 March 2021 as guaranteed by Article 11 of the African Charter and other international human rights instruments; vi. Orders the Respondent to refrain from interfering with the second, third and fourth Applicants’ rights to freedom of assembly when conducted in line with the African Charter; As to reparation: vii. Orders the Respondent to pay the total sum of $15,000 (fifteen thousand US Dollars) to the second, third and fourth Applicants as moral damages for the violation of their right to peaceful assembly. 34