168. The Court considers that such requests are tantamount to requests for coercive measures compelling the Respondent State to enforce the decisions, which would make it an enforcement judge of its own decisions, contrary to Articles 29(2)46 and 3047 of the Protocol on the requirements for enforcing the Court’s decisions. 169. The Court notes that under the latter provision the Respondent State must comply with the Court's decisions without the need for further coercive measures. 170. The Court therefore dismisses the requests for lump sum interest. ii. Legal, mailing, communication and procedural costs 171. The Court notes that the Applicant does not produce evidence in support of the costs he incurred in respect of legal representation, nor those in respect of mailing and communication. Moreover, the Court recalls that proceedings before it are free of charge in line with Rule 32 of its Rules of Procedure. 172. Consequently, the Court dismisses the requests for restitution in the sums of Fifteen Million (15,000,000) CFA francs in respect of legal and procedural costs, and Five Hundred Thousand (500,000) CFA francs in respect of mailing and communications claimed by the Applicant. Article 29(2) of the Protocol provides: “The Council of Ministers shall also be notified of the judgment and shall monitor its execution on behalf of the Assembly” 47Article 30 of the Protocol provides: “The States parties to the […] Protocol undertake to comply with the judgment in any case to which they are parties within the time stipulated by the Court and to guarantee its execution”. 46 44