82. The Court considers, therefore, that the Application does not satisfy the requirement of Rule 50(2)(e) of the Rules. ii. Other admissibility requirements 83. Having found that the Application does not meet the requirement of Rule 50(2)(e) of the Rules, and in view of the cumulative nature of the admissibility requirements,30 the Court does not have to rule on the other admissibility requirements under Article 56(1), (2), (3), (4), (6) and (7) of the Charter as restated in Rule 50(2)(a), (b), (c), (d), (f), and (g) of the Rules.31 84. In the light of the foregoing, the Court declares the Application inadmissible. VII. COSTS 85. The Parties pray that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the other. *** 86. Under Article 32(2) of the Rules “unless otherwise decided by the Court, each party shall bear its own costs.” 87. The Court finds that nothing in the circumstances of this case warrants a departure from this principle. 88. Accordingly, the Court decides that each Party shall bear its own costs. 30 Mariam Kouma and Ousmane Diabaté v. Republic of Mali (jurisdiction and admissibility) (21 March 2018) 2 AfCLR 237, § 63; Rutabingwa Chrysanthe v. Republic of Rwanda (jurisdiction and admissibility) (11 May 2018) 2 AfCLR 361, § 48; Collectif des anciens travailleurs ALS v. Republic of Mali, AfCHPR (jurisdiction and admissibility) (Judgment of 28 March 2019) 3 AfCLR 73, § 39. 31 Ibid. 21

Select target paragraph3