that it did not violate the Applicants’ right to fair trial due to the manner in which the domestic courts treated the evidence against the Second Applicant. VIII. REPARATIONS 105. In respect of reparations, the First Applicant prays that the Court should order his release from prison and that he be paid compensation amounting to United States Dollar Five Hundred Thousand ($500 000) to cover the damages he has suffered due to “a fabricated case triggered by artificial evidence case of the respondent.” He also prays that the Court should order compensation for his dependents. 106. In his submissions on reparations, the Second Applicant pleads as follows: i. The Applicant prays that this Court restores justice where it was overlooked and quash the conviction against him, sets aside the sentence and let him at liberty. ii. Award of reparations iii. Award of costs iv. Award of legal fees in the domestic courts and this Honourable Court. v. Damages. vi. The Applicant therefore prays for this Honourable Court to grant any other Order(s) or Relief(s) sought that this Honourable Court may deem fit. * 107. In Response to the First Applicant’s submission on reparations, the Respondent State prays the Court for the following: i. A declaration that, the Applicant’s trial in the domestic courts of the Respondent State leading to the conviction and sentence was lawful and in accordance with national laws, the African Charter and other relevant international human rights instruments. 28