152. The Court notes that for reparations for material prejudice to be granted, there must be a causal link between the violation established by the Court and the prejudice caused and there should be a specification of the nature of the prejudice and proof thereof.46 153. The Court notes that the Applicant has not established the link between the violation established of his rights and his alleged loss of income. Rather, the Applicant’s claims are directly linked to his conviction and incarceration, which this Court did not find unlawful. 154. The Court, consequently, dismisses the Applicant’s claims for reparations for material prejudice. ii. Moral prejudice 155. With respect to moral prejudice, the Applicant prays the Court to order the Respondent State to: i. Pay the Applicant Twelve Million Tanzanian Shillings (TSH 12,000,000) as compensation for keeping the Applicant in restraint, after his arrest, for five days without any meal. ii. Pay the Applicant Ten Million Tanzanian Shillings (TSH 10,000,000) as compensation for his case not being tried within a reasonable time. iii. Compensate the Applicant for his children being chased from school after him being arrested by the Respondent State’s agents, which led to an infringement of their right to education, protected by Article 11(2)(3) of the Respondent State’s Constitution. iv. Compensate the Applicant for the pain of losing of his house following the Respondent State’s violation of his rights and in particular the failure to provide him with legal representation. * 46 Kijiji Isiaga v. United Republic of Tanzania, ACtHPR, Application No. 032/2015, Judgment of 25 June 2021 (reparations), § 20. 37