17. The Respondent prays that the Reference be dismissed with costs . SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 18. At a Scheduling Conference held on 24 February 2012 it was agreed that the following were the issues to be determined by the Court: i) Whether the Reference is properly before the Court; ii) Whether the Treaty and the Common Market Protocol take away the sovereignty of Uganda to deny entry to unwanted persons who are citizens of Partner States of the EAC; iii) Whether the Applicant was detained at Entebbe International Airport and whether the actions complained of, of the Republic of Uganda, were in conformity with Articles 6 (d) and 7(2) of the Treaty; iv) Whether the actions of the Republic of Uganda were in conformity with Article 104 of the EAC Treaty and Article 7 (6) of the Common Market Protocol; v) Whether the Provisions of section 52 of the Uganda Citizenship and Immigration Act are inconsistent and in violation of Articles 6 (d), 7 (2) and 104 of the Treat and Article 7 of the Protocol; vi) Whether the Applicant is entitled to the prayers sought. REFERENCE NO.5 OF 2011      Page 8