2016, the public prosecutor released him, but the security forces forcibly took him again. Mr. Medhat Mohammed Bahieddin Ahmed’s whereabouts are still not known. 8. Regarding the need to exhaust domestic remedies, the Complainants submit that the exhaustion of domestic remedies after the coup and under the current regime has become absolutely impossible as the judiciary in Egypt is now compromised as it has subdued itself to the military rulers who are now ruling in the country. As a result, the Complainant alleges that the judges are not impartial and issue unjustifiably harsh sentences against victims, mplainant also alleges that any other international dispute s and that the Complaint has. been fil with Article 56(6) of the Afr: t 10. The Complairiant alle 5, 6,7, 8, 19, 60. Procedure 12. The Africa issi n man and Peoples’ Rights (the Commission) was “om: m ication during the 58t Ordinary Session of the from | 6 to 20 April 2016. e verbale Respondent Si fe) were dated informed 28 April of the 2016 the Complainant decision to be seized and the and the Complainant was requested to present evidence and arguments on admissibility within two (2) months. 14. By letter and note verbale dated 25 July 2016 the Complainant and the Respondent State were informed that the Communication was deferred during the 20t Extra-Ordinary Session, pending receipt of the Complainant's submissions on admissibility.