In doing so, a real loss incurred by the Claimant will be reached
and redressed.
If the Claimant was to serve a five year contract as a Project
Accountant governed by EAC Staff Rules and Regulations, she
would have been paid USD 4,440.00 (United States of America
dollars: Four thousand, four hundred and forty only) per
month and USD 266,400.00 (United States Dollars: Two
hundred and sixty six thousand, four hundred only) for the
duration of her contract (60 months).
This basic salary of USD 4,440.00 (United States of America
dollars: Four thousand, four hundred and forty only) was
given in all pleadings by Counsel for the Respondent and it has
never been disputed by Counsel for the Claimant who instead
constantly focused on the position of a Project Accountant;
Professional
Staff
member
under
EAC
Staff
Rules
and
Regulations.
As a Project Accountant under RISP funding, the Claimant was
paid a consolidated package of USD 6,128.00 (United States of
America dollars: Six thousand, one hundred and twenty eight
only) per month. For the service rendered to the Community, the
Claimant has been paid an amount of USD 257,376.00 (United
States of America dollars:
Two hundred and fifty seven
thousand, three hundred and seventy six only).
From the
following computation, it is obvious that the loss incurred by the
Claimant as per misrepresentation of the Council decision by the
Respondent is the balance between amounts USD 266,400.00 –
USD 257,376.00. As a result, special damages sought in this
CLAIM NO.1 OF 2012
Page 29