In doing so, a real loss incurred by the Claimant will be reached and redressed. If the Claimant was to serve a five year contract as a Project Accountant governed by EAC Staff Rules and Regulations, she would have been paid USD 4,440.00 (United States of America dollars: Four thousand, four hundred and forty only) per month and USD 266,400.00 (United States Dollars: Two hundred and sixty six thousand, four hundred only) for the duration of her contract (60 months). This basic salary of USD 4,440.00 (United States of America dollars: Four thousand, four hundred and forty only) was given in all pleadings by Counsel for the Respondent and it has never been disputed by Counsel for the Claimant who instead constantly focused on the position of a Project Accountant; Professional Staff member under EAC Staff Rules and Regulations. As a Project Accountant under RISP funding, the Claimant was paid a consolidated package of USD 6,128.00 (United States of America dollars: Six thousand, one hundred and twenty eight only) per month. For the service rendered to the Community, the Claimant has been paid an amount of USD 257,376.00 (United States of America dollars: Two hundred and fifty seven thousand, three hundred and seventy six only). From the following computation, it is obvious that the loss incurred by the Claimant as per misrepresentation of the Council decision by the Respondent is the balance between amounts USD 266,400.00 – USD 257,376.00. As a result, special damages sought in this CLAIM NO.1 OF 2012 Page 29

Select target paragraph3