148. The Court will now proceed to award what it considers reasonable for each of the heads of properties listed. Ahead of the award for damages the Court notes that the number of market stall listed in exh C (iii) is 220 as against 300 listed in the summary of reliefs sought in page 15 of the amended Application. The Court therefore admits as established 220 market stall. Also the number of household items and motor vehicles are not stated in the summary of reliefs, but the Court notes that the numbers are reflected as 220 and 123 in Exhibit D and F respectively thus they are so admitted. 149. Decision. 150. This Court after examining the written submissions, and having heard parties in open Court in the first and last resort and for the reasons canvassed above, decides as follows: 151. Declares: 1. That the 1st Applicant has locus standi to sue on behalf of the victims listed in exhibits 2-10 only and not for itself. 2. That there has been a violation of Article 4 of the African Charter in respect of the killings of the 827 named applicants in Exhibit 26 arising from the attack of the communities in Zonkwa, Fadan Daji, Gidan Maga, Daddu, Farman, Madakiya, Matsirga, Samara Kataf, Maraban Rido, and Unguwan Rimi in the southern Kaduna district of Kaduna State 3. That there was no violation of Article 1 of the African Charter on the Respondents obligation to carry out an adequate and effective investigation into the circumstances surrounding the mass killings and destruction of properties of the within named Applicants communities in Zonkwa, Fadan Daji, Gidan Maga, Daddu, Farman, Madakiya, Matsirga, Samara Kataf, Maraban Rido, and Unguwan Rimi in the southern Kaduna district of Kaduna State. 4. That there has been a violation of Article 1 of the African Charter on account of the Respondent’s failure to timeously deploy security agents to the hotspots in respect to the attacks in Zonkwa, Fadan Daji, Gidan Maga, 42