62. The Applicant further contends that if the Court in its Judgment recognises his wife and children as vicarious victims, it should award them reparation taking into account its jurisprudence on the matter. He refers to the amount awarded by the Court in Application No. 013/2017: Sébastien Germain Ajavon v. Republic of Benin and prays the Court to review its decision by re-evaluating the amount of reparation for non-pecuniary damage suffered by his wife and children to an amount higher than the amounts awarded to the wife and each of the children of Mr. Sébastien Germain Ajavon. 63. He further submits that the Court failed to take into account all the mental suffering he endured for more than twenty-six (26) years as a result of the violations of his rights as captured in paragraphs 435 and 486 of the initial application and therefore must award him fair reparation equivalent to the duration of his suffering and the gravity of the violations of his rights. He alleges that the moral suffering he endured during these twenty-six (26) years, of which more than ten were spent in prison, is heavier than those of Sébastien Germain Ajavon who was never in prison. For all these considerations, he requests the Court to review its judgment of 2 December 2021 and award him the amount of Three Billion (3,000,000,000) CFA francs as reparation for the moral damage he suffered. * 64. The Respondent State submits that there is no basis for the Applicant to rely on a situation that is supposedly comparable to his in order to request a review of the amount of reparation for the non-pecuniary damage that he and his family members allegedly suffered. It further contends that the Court should dismiss the Applicant's request as it does not rule by comparing similar situations. *** 18