-4 6. Furthermore, the Defendants wrote Petition to the Police in Sierra Leone alleging that the Plaintiff was not a diplomat, but a criminal impersonator. The Plaintiff was publicly humiliated, arrested and detained along her movable properties by agents of the 5th and 6th Defendants. 7. The Plaintiff suffered serious damages, unnecessary expenses, untold hardship and mental trauma, ill health, gross violations of fundamental rights to privacy, dignity of human person and unlawful detention of the Plaintiff/Applicant’s properties, internal displacement and public humiliation as a result of the wrongful acts of the Defendants. 8. The Plaintiff alleged that there were newly discovered fundamental contradictions in the judgment, which necessitated the Applicant’s Application for review and supplemental judgment. 9. The Plaintiff avers that if these discovered contradictions were taken into consideration, they would be a decisive factor indeed and that if such facts had been taken at the time of the judgment, it would have affected the decision of the Court in favor of the Plaintiff/Applicant. 6.2. CONTRADICTIONS ALLEGED BY PLAINTIFF 1. The Plaintiff avers the first contradiction is that the Court considered Plaintiff’s claims as being presented separately, while the Plaintiff avers that her claims were consolidated. 2. The second contradiction is the question whether other claims flow from a breach of terms of employment should not arise, because it is not supported or assumed by the Application before the Court.