16 9.10.1. First, the Application does not show any evidence anywhere whether three months had not elapsed from the date the Applicant had knowledge of the alleged “NEW FACT.” 9.10.2. Secondly, and more importantly, such new fact is not demonstrated. We observe that the Application goes back to requests made in the previous trial proceedings and appears to criticize the approach taken by the Court; but the said Application does not disclose any new fact which was unknown to both the Applicant and the Court at the time of the previous Judgment. In the words of the Applicant as found on pages 4 and 5 of her Application, she indicates what she considers the new fact: “…treated all the issues brought by the Plaintiff/Applicant as being tied to unlawful dismissal when they were not, rather than multifaceted and independent, but consolidated issues with common Defendants as separately identified, acknowledged and clearly summarized in paragraph 31 pages 1215 of the \judgment ECW/CCJ/JUD/01/13 is the surprising new fact that came to the knowledge of the Plaintiff/Applicant only after receipt of copy of subject judgment ECW/CCJ/JUD/01/13 on 13th February 2013.” 9.11. As we have stated supra, this suit is nothing more than the Plaintiff’s attempt to criticize the Court’s Ruling which she seeks to have revised to conform to what she wants. In fact, if we look more closely, we realize that the Plaintiff is seeking justification from the Court on certain points and asking the Court to increase her monetary award. She in a clever way attempts to have this Court review the previous judgment in an appeal sitting, which we do not have the right, the power, the authority or the mandate to do, and certainly we do not have the will to engage in such dangerous precedent. She completely strays away from the main issue of NEW FACT. 9.12. The concept of “a new fact” which is of prime importance in a revision proceeding, is defined with rigor and restrictions, both before (a) International Courts and Tribunals other than the ECOWAS Court, and (b) before the ECOWAS Court itself.