14 “18. The defendant/applicant in claiming that the amount of damages awarded to the Plaintiff/respondent is excessive having regard to the evidence before the Court is simply claiming that the judgment is erroneous. It is trite learning that if a judgment is erroneous, it is a ground for appeal but not for review as contemplated by Article 25 of Protocol A/P1/7/91 and Article 92 of the Rules of this Court.” “Article 19(2) of Protocol A/P1/7/91 makes it clear that judgments of this Court are final and binding, subject to the provisions of a review. The decisions of this Court are thus not subject to appeal. The Court will not welcome any attempt to use the limited review process as an appeal process, and thereby circumvent the fact that these decisions are final.” See pages 4-7 of that Ruling. 9. CONCLUSION 9.1. The provision of Article 25 of the Protocol on the Community Court of Justice is not a license for automatic review of decisions made by the Court; the Applicant must show clearly a mistake of law or of fact which was not then known to the Applicant which, if it had been known, would have led the Court to produce a different disposition of the case. 9.2. In this instant case, it is crystal clear that all issues raised in this new Application seeking the revision of the Court’s earlier decisions, were all included from the very inception of the filing of this case and the Court considered the totality of the case and made a determination. We do not feel there is any legal reason to justify the reversal/ review of the Ruling/Judgment and alter the awards made by this Court. Therefore, the Application is not admissible and the claims sought should be denied, and the original judgments and rulings of this Court ordered enforced without any further delay. 9.3. Having said the above, there are a few observations the Court would like to make as we conclude this Judgment. 9.4. First and foremost, this case is a case for alleged violations of human rights and as such was brought under the human rights jurisdiction of this Court, as the Applicant herself cited and relied on the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. Therefore, a complaint for human rights violation is properly brought against States parties to the Charter and not other kinds of persons.