A/HRC/22/45
Philippines
Number of
outstanding
cases at the
beginning of
the period
under review
621
Cases transmitted to the
Government during the period
under review: 0
Cases clarified during the period
under review: 0
Cases sent under Cases sent
the urgent action under the
procedure
standard
procedure
Government
0
0
0
Non-governmental
sources
Number of
outstanding cases
at the end of the
year under review
0
621
Number of cases on which
the Government has replied
Multiple replies on some cases
Number of cases of possible clarification
by Government (6-month rule)
0
N/A
0
Urgent appeal
N/A
Government response
N/A
General allegation
Yes(2009/2012)
Government response
No
Prompt intervention letter
N/A
Government response
N/A
Working Group request for a visit
Yes
Invitation extended
No
General allegations
Summary of the general allegation
316. The Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances received
information from credible sources concerning reported obstacles encountered in the
implementation of the Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from Enforced
Disappearance in the Philippines. This information was transmitted to the Government on
16 April 2012.i
317. Sources reported on serious violations of human rights in the Philippines, such as
enforced disappearances. It is alleged that these abuses persist in part because of the
Philippines police‘s failure to conduct thorough and impartial investigations, particularly
when evidence points to the involvement of the military. The ability to bring the
perpetrators to justice has also been hindered by the Justice Department‘s inadequate
protection program for witnesses, who have been subject to harassment and intimidation.
318. Sources also reported that several victims were killed or abducted in front of
witnesses. The perpetrators either wore civilian clothes with bonnets (balaclavas), or wore
military uniforms and made no attempt to hide their faces. According to the sources, in
several cases there is evidence that soldiers worked with members of paramilitary forces—
primarily the Citizen Armed Force Geographical Unit (CAFGU)—or paid military ―assets,‖
including ―rebel returnees‖ (former New People‘s Army –members). It is reported that the
military appears to have targeted several of these victims as CPP-NPA (Communist Party
of the Philippines - New People‘s Army) members because of their involvement with leftist
organizations, work on land reform, or opposition to military presence in their
communities.
319. The sources alleged that police investigations into reports of enforced
disappearances are woefully inadequate. Several core aspects of investigations are often
disregarded by investigators, including effectively examining crime scenes and canvassing
for witnesses. Witness protection is rarely provided and, where it is provided, the protection
i
88
A/HRC/19/58/Rev.1, para. 22.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents