13. On 4 May 2012, the same day of his release, the Complainant was summoned to report to the office of the examining magistrate on 8 May 2012, but when his lawyers went to that office on 7 May 2012 to consult the case file, they were unable to have access to the file because the examining magistrate was absent. According to the Complainant, it then became clear that the date and venue of the meeting had been changed unilaterally without consultation with his lawyers. Thus, in the morning of 7 May 2012, the day before the meeting, the examining magistrate went very early to the prison to indict the Complainant once again in the absence of his lawyers. The Complainant avers that the new indictment and the detention attached thereto were based on charges for which a judicial investigation had already been opened and an initial indictment made on 6 August 2008. 14. Lastly, the Complainant submits that his petition filed on 9 May 2012 for an annulment of the indictment had elicited no response on 26 June 2012, the date the Commission was seized of the matter. Articles alleged to have been violated 15. The Complainant alleges a violation of Article 7 of the African Charter. Prayers 16. The Complainant prays the Commission to:  Urge Cameroon to urgently put an end to the said violations;  Set a short timeframe for the Respondent State to release the Complainant; 4